In Rust, the Xeon E5-2670 v3 is slower than the Core Ultra 9 275HX. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2670 v3
No clear advantages
Core Ultra 9 275HX
- Up to 28% faster in Rust – 280 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 28% faster in Rust
- Is 10 years and 4 months newer – Jan 13, 2025 vs Sep 08, 2014
- Is 10 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 54% less energy – 55 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 54% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Rust FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2670 v3 vs Core Ultra 9 275HX: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 9 275HX
Jan 13th, 2025
Average FPS
280 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
91 FPS
100%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2670 v3 vs Core Ultra 9 275HX in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2670 v3 vs Core Ultra 9 275HX in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2670 v3
Sep 8th, 2014
Cores
12-core
50%
L3 Cache
30 MB
83%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
85%
Turbo Frequency
3.1 GHz
57%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
33%
Core Ultra 9 275HX
Jan 13th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2670 v3 Sep 8th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 275HX Jan 13th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Released | Jan 13th, 2025 |
| $1,589.00 | MSRP | – |
Server | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | Intel BGA 2114 |
| 120 W | Power Consumption | 55 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
