In Assassin's Creed Valhalla, the Xeon E5-2670 v2 is slightly faster than the Core i7-9700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2670 v2
- Up to 1% faster in Assassin's Creed Valhalla – 250 vs 247 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Core i7-9700F
- Is 5 years and 7 months newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 5 years and 7 months newer
- Consumes up to 43% less energy – 65 vs 115 Watts
- Consumes up to 43% less energy
Assassin's Creed Valhalla FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2670 v2 vs Core i7-9700F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
247 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
181 FPS
100%
Price, $
$279
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.12/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2670 v2 vs Core i7-9700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2670 v2 vs Core i7-9700F in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2670 v2
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
70%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
80%
L3 Cache
12 MB
48%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2670 v2 Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-9700F Apr 23rd, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | $333.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 115W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
