In Deathloop, the Xeon E5-2667 is same performance as the Ryzen 3 4100. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $88 more expensive!
Xeon E5-2667
No clear advantages
Ryzen 3 4100
- Is 10 years and 28 days newer – Apr 04, 2022 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 10 years and 28 days newer
- Up to 56% cheaper – $68.65 vs $156.80
- Up to 56% cheaper
- Up to 56% better value in Deathloop – $0.31 vs $0.71/FPS
- Up to 56% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2667 vs Ryzen 3 4100: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-2667
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
219 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
99%
Price, $
$156.8
43%
Value, $/FPS
$0.71/FPS
44%
Ryzen 3 4100
Apr 4th, 2022
Average FPS
220 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
165 FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.65
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2667 vs Ryzen 3 4100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2667 vs Ryzen 3 4100 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2667
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
15 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
88%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 3 4100
Apr 4th, 2022
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
53%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2667 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 3 4100 Apr 4th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $99.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | AM4 |
| 130W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
