In Lost Ark, the Xeon E5-2667 is slightly slower than the Core i9-14900KF. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $286 cheaper!
Xeon E5-2667
- Up to 65% cheaper – $156.80 vs $442.99
- Up to 65% cheaper
- Up to 62% better value in Lost Ark – $0.62 vs $1.62/FPS
- Up to 62% better value in Lost Ark
Core i9-14900KF
- Up to 8% faster in Lost Ark – 272 vs 252 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in Lost Ark
- Is 11 years and 7 months newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 11 years and 7 months newer
- Consumes up to 4% less energy – 125 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 4% less energy
Lost Ark FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2667 vs Core i9-14900KF: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-2667
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
252 FPS
93%
Min 1% FPS
119 FPS
58%
Price, $
$156.8
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.62/FPS
100%
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
272 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
204 FPS
100%
Price, $
$442.99
35%
Value, $/FPS
$1.62/FPS
38%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2667 vs Core i9-14900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2667 vs Core i9-14900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2667
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
15 MB
42%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
58%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2667 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900KF Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $564.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 130W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
