In Deathloop, the Xeon E5-2667 is same performance as the Core i7-9700. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $164 cheaper!
Xeon E5-2667
- Up to 51% cheaper – $156.80 vs $321.27
- Up to 51% cheaper
- Up to 51% better value in Deathloop – $0.71 vs $1.45/FPS
- Up to 51% better value in Deathloop
Core i7-9700
- Is 7 years and 1 month newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 7 years and 1 month newer
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2667 vs Core i7-9700: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-2667
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
220 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
165 FPS
100%
Price, $
$156.8
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.71/FPS
100%
Core i7-9700
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
221 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
165 FPS
100%
Price, $
$321.27
48%
Value, $/FPS
$1.45/FPS
49%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2667 vs Core i7-9700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2667 vs Core i7-9700 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2667
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
15 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
74%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-9700
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
80%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2667 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-9700 Apr 23rd, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | $333.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 130W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
