In Deathloop, the Xeon E5-2667 is slightly slower than the Core i3-14100F and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $828 more expensive!
Xeon E5-2667
No clear advantages
Core i3-14100F
- Up to 5% faster in Deathloop – 230 vs 220 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in Deathloop
- Is 11 years and 10 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 11 years and 10 months newer
- Up to 90% cheaper – $96.99 vs $925.00
- Up to 90% cheaper
- Up to 90% better value in Deathloop – $0.42 vs $4.20/FPS
- Up to 90% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 55% less energy – 58 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 55% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2667 vs Core i3-14100F: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-2667
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
220 FPS
96%
Min 1% FPS
165 FPS
96%
Price, $
$925
10%
Value, $/FPS
$4.2/FPS
10%
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
230 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
172 FPS
100%
Price, $
$96.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2667 vs Core i3-14100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2667 vs Core i3-14100F in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2667
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
15 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
74%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
12 MB
80%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2667 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $109.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 58 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
