In Control, the Xeon E5-2667 is slightly slower than the Core i3-10100, it's also the same value for money, as it's only $3 cheaper!
Xeon E5-2667
- Up to 2% cheaper – $156.80 vs $159.99
- Up to 2% cheaper
Core i3-10100
- Up to 1% faster in Control – 248 vs 245 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Control
- Is 8 years and 1 month newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 8 years and 1 month newer
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Control FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2667 vs Core i3-10100: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-2667
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
245 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
98%
Price, $
$156.8
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
100%
Core i3-10100
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
100%
Price, $
$159.99
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2667 vs Core i3-10100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2667 vs Core i3-10100 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2667
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
15 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
81%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-10100
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
40%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2667 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-10100 Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 130W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
