Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 8700G outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 8700G is 3409 days newer than Xeon E5-2667 v3.
Advantages of Ryzen 7 8700G
- Performs up to 22% better in Battlefield IV than Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 478 vs 392 FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 65 vs 135 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
478
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
100%
Price, $
$254.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $254.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 219 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2667 v3 | vs | Ryzen 7 8700G |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
135 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
No | Overclockable | Yes |