In The Last of Us Part II, the Xeon E5-2667 v3 is slightly faster than the Core i9-14900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2667 v3
- Up to 5% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 178 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in The Last of Us Part II
Core i9-14900F
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Sep 08, 2014
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 52% less energy – 65 vs 135 Watts
- Consumes up to 52% less energy
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2667 v3 vs Core i9-14900F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
170 FPS
96%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
95%
Price, $
$476
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.8/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2667 v3 vs Core i9-14900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2667 v3 vs Core i9-14900F in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2667 v3
Sep 8th, 2014
Cores
8-core
33%
L3 Cache
20 MB
56%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
62%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
38%
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
62%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2667 v3 Sep 8th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| $2,057.00 | MSRP | $524.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 135 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
