In Atomfall, the Xeon E5-2667 v3 is slower than the Core i9-13900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2667 v3
No clear advantages
Core i9-13900KF
- Up to 19% faster in Atomfall – 246 vs 206 FPS
- Up to 19% faster in Atomfall
- Is 8 years and 19 days newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Sep 08, 2014
- Is 8 years and 19 days newer
- Consumes up to 7% less energy – 125 vs 135 Watts
- Consumes up to 7% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2667 v3 vs Core i9-13900KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-13900KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
246 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$549
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.23/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2667 v3 vs Core i9-13900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2667 v3 vs Core i9-13900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2667 v3
Sep 8th, 2014
Cores
8-core
33%
L3 Cache
20 MB
56%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
62%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
38%
Core i9-13900KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2667 v3 Sep 8th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900KF Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| $2,057.00 | MSRP | $564.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 135 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
