In Atomfall, the Xeon E5-2667 v3 is slightly faster than the Core i7-820QM. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2667 v3
- Up to 11% faster in Atomfall – 206 vs 185 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Atomfall
- Is 4 years and 11 months newer – Sep 08, 2014 vs Sep 23, 2009
- Is 4 years and 11 months newer
Core i7-820QM
- Consumes up to 67% less energy – 45 vs 135 Watts
- Consumes up to 67% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2667 v3 vs Core i7-820QM: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2667 v3 vs Core i7-820QM in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2667 v3 vs Core i7-820QM in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2667 v3
Sep 8th, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Core i7-820QM
Sep 23rd, 2009
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
40%
Base Frequency
1.733 GHz
54%
Turbo Frequency
3.067 GHz
85%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
62%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2667 v3 Sep 8th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-820QM Sep 23rd, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 8th, 2014 | Released | Sep 23rd, 2009 |
| $2,057.00 | MSRP | $546.00 |
Server | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | LGAG1 |
| 135 W | Power Consumption | 45 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | None |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
