In The Last of Us Part I, the Xeon E5-2667 v3 is slightly faster than the Core i7-13700. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2667 v3
- Up to 6% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 227 vs 214 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in The Last of Us Part I
Core i7-13700
- Is 8 years and 3 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Sep 08, 2014
- Is 8 years and 3 months newer
- Consumes up to 52% less energy – 65 vs 135 Watts
- Consumes up to 52% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2667 v3 vs Core i7-13700: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-13700
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
214 FPS
94%
Min 1% FPS
161 FPS
95%
Price, $
$369.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.72/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2667 v3 vs Core i7-13700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2667 v3 vs Core i7-13700 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2667 v3
Sep 8th, 2014
Cores
8-core
50%
L3 Cache
20 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
69%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
38%
Core i7-13700
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
66%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2667 v3 Sep 8th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-13700 Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| $2,057.00 | MSRP | $384.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 135 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
