In Rust, the Xeon E5-2667 v2 is quite a bit slower than the Core Ultra 9 285K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2667 v2
No clear advantages
Core Ultra 9 285K
- Up to 35% faster in Rust – 288 vs 214 FPS
- Up to 35% faster in Rust
- Is 11 years and 1 month newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 11 years and 1 month newer
- Consumes up to 4% less energy – 125 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 4% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Rust FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2667 v2 vs Core Ultra 9 285K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 9 285K
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
288 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
97 FPS
100%
Price, $
$505.16
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.75/FPS
100%
![Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Tetracosa-core [24 Core] 3.70 GHz Processor - OEM Pack - Box](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/cpus/B0DFKC99VL.jpg)
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2667 v2 vs Core Ultra 9 285K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2667 v2 vs Core Ultra 9 285K in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2667 v2
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
8-core
33%
L3 Cache
20 MB
56%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
70%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 9 285K
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2667 v2 Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 285K Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $589.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
