In Ghost of Tsushima, the Xeon E5-2667 v2 is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-13900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2667 v2
No clear advantages
Core i9-13900KF
- Up to 43% faster in Ghost of Tsushima – 162 vs 113 FPS
- Up to 43% faster in Ghost of Tsushima
- Is 9 years and 25 days newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 9 years and 25 days newer
- Consumes up to 4% less energy – 125 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 4% less energy
Ghost of Tsushima FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2667 v2 vs Core i9-13900KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-13900KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
162 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
121 FPS
100%
Price, $
$549
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.38/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2667 v2 vs Core i9-13900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2667 v2 vs Core i9-13900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2667 v2
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
8-core
33%
L3 Cache
20 MB
56%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
69%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-13900KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2667 v2 Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900KF Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $564.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
