In Rust, the Xeon E5-2667 v2 is slower than the Core i7-13700K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2667 v2
No clear advantages
Core i7-13700K
- Up to 29% faster in Rust – 276 vs 214 FPS
- Up to 29% faster in Rust
- Is 9 years and 25 days newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 9 years and 25 days newer
- Consumes up to 4% less energy – 125 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 4% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Rust FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2667 v2 vs Core i7-13700K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2667 v2 vs Core i7-13700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2667 v2 vs Core i7-13700K in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2667 v2
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
8-core
50%
L3 Cache
20 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
74%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-13700K
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2667 v2 Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-13700K Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $409.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
