Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Xeon E5-2665 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 3166 days newer than Xeon E5-2665.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 14% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Xeon E5-2665 - 194 vs 170 FPS
- Consumes up to 9% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2665 - 105 vs 115 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2665 - 24 vs 16 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
194
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.5/FPS
100%
Price, $
$291.69
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $291.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 290 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2665 | vs | Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
115 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |