In Deathloop, the Xeon E5-2665 is slightly faster than the Core i3-4150. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2665
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 220 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
Core i3-4150
- Is 2 years and 1 month newer – May 01, 2014 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 2 years and 1 month newer
- Consumes up to 53% less energy – 54 vs 115 Watts
- Consumes up to 53% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2665 vs Core i3-4150: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2665 vs Core i3-4150 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2665 vs Core i3-4150 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2665
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-4150
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
15%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2665 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-4150 May 1st, 2014 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| – | MSRP | $117.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1150 |
| 115W | Power Consumption | 54W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4400 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
