In The Last of Us Part II, the Xeon E5-2660 v3 is slightly slower than the Ryzen Embedded V1756B. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2660 v3
No clear advantages
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 182 vs 181 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Is 3 years and 5 months newer – Feb 21, 2018 vs Sep 08, 2014
- Is 3 years and 5 months newer
- Consumes up to 57% less energy – 45 vs 105 Watts
- Consumes up to 57% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2660 v3 vs Ryzen Embedded V1756B: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
Feb 21st, 2018
Average FPS
182 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
136 FPS
100%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2660 v3 vs Ryzen Embedded V1756B in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2660 v3 vs Ryzen Embedded V1756B in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2660 v3
Sep 8th, 2014
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
80%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
92%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
Feb 21st, 2018
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
2 MB
8%
Base Frequency
3.25 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2660 v3 Sep 8th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Embedded V1756B Feb 21st, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Released | Feb 21st, 2018 |
| $1,445.00 | MSRP | – |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | FP5 |
| 105 W | Power Consumption | 45 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR4 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Radeon Vega 8 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
