In The Callisto Protocol, the Xeon E5-2660 v3 is slightly slower than the Core i3-8300. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2660 v3
No clear advantages
Core i3-8300
- Up to 5% faster in The Callisto Protocol – 119 vs 113 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in The Callisto Protocol
- Is 3 years and 5 months newer – Feb 14, 2018 vs Sep 08, 2014
- Is 3 years and 5 months newer
- Consumes up to 41% less energy – 62 vs 105 Watts
- Consumes up to 41% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
The Callisto Protocol FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2660 v3 vs Core i3-8300: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2660 v3 vs Core i3-8300 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2660 v3 vs Core i3-8300 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2660 v3
Sep 8th, 2014
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
70%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
89%
Core i3-8300
Feb 14th, 2018
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
8 MB
32%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2660 v3 Sep 8th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-8300 Feb 14th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Released | Feb 14th, 2018 |
| $1,445.00 | MSRP | $138.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 105 W | Power Consumption | 62 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
