In Deathloop, the Xeon E5-2660 v3 is slightly slower than the Core i3-14100. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2660 v3
No clear advantages
Core i3-14100
- Up to 5% faster in Deathloop – 229 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in Deathloop
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Sep 08, 2014
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 43% less energy – 60 vs 105 Watts
- Consumes up to 43% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2660 v3 vs Core i3-14100: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
229 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
172 FPS
100%
Price, $
$149.35
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.65/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2660 v3 vs Core i3-14100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2660 v3 vs Core i3-14100 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2660 v3
Sep 8th, 2014
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
70%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
44%
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
12 MB
48%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2660 v3 Sep 8th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100 Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| $1,445.00 | MSRP | $134.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 105 W | Power Consumption | 60 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 730 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
