Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms Xeon E5-2650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 3166 days newer than Xeon E5-2650.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2650
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 95 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 38% better in World of Warcraft than Xeon E5-2650 - 212 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2650 - 32 vs 16 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
212
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.62/FPS
100%
Price, $
$343.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $343.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 102 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2650 | vs | Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |