In Atomfall, the Xeon E5-2650 is slightly slower than the Ryzen 3 4100 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $61 more expensive!
Xeon E5-2650
No clear advantages
Ryzen 3 4100
- Up to 12% faster in Atomfall – 211 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 12% faster in Atomfall
- Is 10 years and 28 days newer – Apr 04, 2022 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 10 years and 28 days newer
- Up to 47% cheaper – $69.00 vs $129.94
- Up to 47% cheaper
- Up to 54% better value in Atomfall – $0.32 vs $0.69/FPS
- Up to 54% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2650 vs Ryzen 3 4100: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-2650
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
188 FPS
89%
Min 1% FPS
141 FPS
89%
Price, $
$129.94
53%
Value, $/FPS
$0.69/FPS
46%
Ryzen 3 4100
Apr 4th, 2022
Average FPS
211 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
158 FPS
100%
Price, $
$69
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2650 vs Ryzen 3 4100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2650 vs Ryzen 3 4100 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2650
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
53%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
70%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 3 4100
Apr 4th, 2022
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
40%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2650 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 3 4100 Apr 4th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $99.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | AM4 |
| 95W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
