In Elden Ring, the Xeon E5-2650 is slightly slower than the Core i9-14900KF. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $313 cheaper!
Xeon E5-2650
- Up to 71% cheaper – $129.94 vs $442.99
- Up to 71% cheaper
- Up to 69% better value in Elden Ring – $0.92 vs $2.99/FPS
- Up to 69% better value in Elden Ring
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
Core i9-14900KF
- Up to 6% faster in Elden Ring – 148 vs 140 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Elden Ring
- Is 11 years and 7 months newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 11 years and 7 months newer
Elden Ring FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2650 vs Core i9-14900KF: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-2650
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
140 FPS
95%
Min 1% FPS
98 FPS
88%
Price, $
$129.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
100%
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
148 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
111 FPS
100%
Price, $
$442.99
29%
Value, $/FPS
$2.99/FPS
31%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2650 vs Core i9-14900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2650 vs Core i9-14900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2650
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
8-core
33%
L3 Cache
20 MB
56%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
62%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
47%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2650 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900KF Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $564.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1700 |
95W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
