In Deathloop, the Xeon E5-2650 is same performance as the Core i7-620M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2650
- Is 2 years and 1 month newer – Mar 06, 2012 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 2 years and 1 month newer
Core i7-620M
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2650 vs Core i7-620M: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-2650
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
222 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
99%
Price, $
$129.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2650 vs Core i7-620M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2650 vs Core i7-620M in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2650
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
75%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
84%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-620M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
4 MB
20%
Base Frequency
2.677 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2650 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-620M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | $332.00 |
Server | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | Intel BGA 1288 |
| 95W | Power Consumption | 35W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | HD Graphics (Ironlake) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
