In Rust, the Xeon E5-2650 is same performance as the Celeron G3930. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $101 more expensive!
Xeon E5-2650
No clear advantages
Celeron G3930
- Is 4 years and 9 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 4 years and 9 months newer
- Up to 78% cheaper – $29.00 vs $129.94
- Up to 78% cheaper
- Up to 79% better value in Rust – $0.13 vs $0.62/FPS
- Up to 79% better value in Rust
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 51 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Rust FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2650 vs Celeron G3930: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-2650
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
209 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
41 FPS
100%
Price, $
$129.94
22%
Value, $/FPS
$0.62/FPS
21%
Celeron G3930
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
209 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
41 FPS
100%
Price, $
$29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.13/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2650 vs Celeron G3930 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2650 vs Celeron G3930 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2650
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Celeron G3930
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
2 MB
10%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2650 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron G3930 Jan 3rd, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 95W | Power Consumption | 51W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 610 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
