In Deathloop, the Xeon E5-2650 v3 is slightly slower than the Xeon E5645. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Is 4 years and 5 months newer – Sep 08, 2014 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 4 years and 5 months newer
Xeon E5645
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 221 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 80 vs 105 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2650 v3 vs Xeon E5645: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2650 v3 vs Xeon E5645 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2650 v3 vs Xeon E5645 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Sep 8th, 2014
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
96%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Xeon E5645
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
6-core
60%
L3 Cache
12 MB
48%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
2.666 GHz
89%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2650 v3 Sep 8th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5645 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| $1,166.00 | MSRP | – |
Server | Segment | Server |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | LGA1366 |
| 105W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
