In Atomfall, the Xeon E5-2650 v3 is slower than the Core Ultra 9 285K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Consumes up to 16% less energy – 105 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 16% less energy
Core Ultra 9 285K
- Up to 25% faster in Atomfall – 250 vs 200 FPS
- Up to 25% faster in Atomfall
- Is 10 years and 1 month newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Sep 08, 2014
- Is 10 years and 1 month newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2650 v3 vs Core Ultra 9 285K: Comparison of performance and price
Core Ultra 9 285K
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
250 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
188 FPS
100%
Price, $
$509.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.03/FPS
100%
![Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Tetracosa-core [24 Core] 3.70 GHz Processor - OEM Pack - Box](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/cpus/B0DFKC99VL.jpg)
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2650 v3 vs Core Ultra 9 285K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2650 v3 vs Core Ultra 9 285K in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Sep 8th, 2014
Cores
10-core
42%
L3 Cache
25 MB
69%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
62%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
53%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
33%
Core Ultra 9 285K
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2650 v3 Sep 8th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 285K Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| $1,166.00 | MSRP | $589.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | LGA1851 |
105W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
