In Atomfall, the Xeon E5-2650 v3 is slower than the Core Ultra 7 265F. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $215 cheaper!
Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Up to 74% cheaper – $73.44 vs $288.00
- Up to 74% cheaper
- Up to 69% better value in Atomfall – $0.36 vs $1.17/FPS
- Up to 69% better value in Atomfall
Core Ultra 7 265F
- Up to 22% faster in Atomfall – 245 vs 201 FPS
- Up to 22% faster in Atomfall
- Is 10 years and 3 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Sep 08, 2014
- Is 10 years and 3 months newer
- Consumes up to 38% less energy – 65 vs 105 Watts
- Consumes up to 38% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2650 v3 vs Core Ultra 7 265F: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Sep 8th, 2014
Average FPS
201 FPS
82%
Min 1% FPS
151 FPS
82%
Price, $
$73.44
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$288
25%
Value, $/FPS
$1.17/FPS
31%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2650 v3 vs Core Ultra 7 265F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2650 v3 vs Core Ultra 7 265F in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Sep 8th, 2014
Cores
10-core
50%
L3 Cache
25 MB
83%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
96%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
57%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
33%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2650 v3 Sep 8th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265F Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
| $1,166.00 | MSRP | $379.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 105 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
