In Atomfall, the Xeon E5-2650 v3 is slower than the Core i9-14900KF. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $357 cheaper!
Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Up to 83% cheaper – $73.44 vs $429.99
- Up to 83% cheaper
- Up to 79% better value in Atomfall – $0.36 vs $1.73/FPS
- Up to 79% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 16% less energy – 105 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 16% less energy
Core i9-14900KF
- Up to 23% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 201 FPS
- Up to 23% faster in Atomfall
- Is 9 years and 1 month newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Sep 08, 2014
- Is 9 years and 1 month newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2650 v3 vs Core i9-14900KF: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Sep 8th, 2014
Average FPS
201 FPS
81%
Min 1% FPS
150 FPS
81%
Price, $
$73.44
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$429.99
17%
Value, $/FPS
$1.73/FPS
21%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2650 v3 vs Core i9-14900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2650 v3 vs Core i9-14900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Sep 8th, 2014
Cores
10-core
42%
L3 Cache
25 MB
69%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
72%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
50%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
38%
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2650 v3 Sep 8th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900KF Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| $1,166.00 | MSRP | $564.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | LGA1700 |
105 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
