Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 2614 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 105 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 32% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 154 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 24 vs 20 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
154
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.75/FPS
100%
Price, $
$269.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $269.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2650 v3 | vs | Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 16 |
20 | Threads | 24 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |