In Control, the Xeon E5-2650 v2 is slightly slower than the Core i3-14100F and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $33 more expensive!
Xeon E5-2650 v2
No clear advantages
Core i3-14100F
- Up to 3% faster in Control – 253 vs 246 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Control
- Is 10 years and 4 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 10 years and 4 months newer
- Up to 25% cheaper – $96.99 vs $129.94
- Up to 25% cheaper
- Up to 27% better value in Control – $0.38 vs $0.52/FPS
- Up to 27% better value in Control
- Consumes up to 39% less energy – 58 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 39% less energy
Control FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2650 v2 vs Core i3-14100F: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-2650 v2
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
246 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
97%
Price, $
$129.94
74%
Value, $/FPS
$0.52/FPS
73%
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
253 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
165 FPS
100%
Price, $
$96.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2650 v2 vs Core i3-14100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2650 v2 vs Core i3-14100F in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2650 v2
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
72%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
12 MB
60%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2650 v2 Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $109.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 58 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
