In Atomfall, the Xeon E5-2643 is slightly faster than the Xeon E5-2689. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2643
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall – 192 vs 191 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall
Xeon E5-2689
- Consumes up to 12% less energy – 115 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 12% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2643 vs Xeon E5-2689: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-2643
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
192 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
144 FPS
100%
Price, $
$100.7
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.52/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2643 vs Xeon E5-2689 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2643 vs Xeon E5-2689 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2643
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
10 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
97%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Xeon E5-2689
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
79%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2643 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-2689 Mar 6th, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 6th, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Server | Segment | Server |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA2011 |
| 130W | Power Consumption | 115W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
