In Atomfall, the Xeon E5-2643 is slightly slower than the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $2399 cheaper!
Xeon E5-2643
- Up to 96% cheaper – $100.70 vs $2499.98
- Up to 96% cheaper
- Up to 95% better value in Atomfall – $0.52 vs $11.26/FPS
- Up to 95% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 54% less energy – 130 vs 280 Watts
- Consumes up to 54% less energy
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
- Up to 16% faster in Atomfall – 222 vs 192 FPS
- Up to 16% faster in Atomfall
- Is 7 years and 11 months newer – Feb 07, 2020 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 7 years and 11 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2643 vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-2643
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
192 FPS
86%
Min 1% FPS
144 FPS
87%
Price, $
$100.7
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.52/FPS
100%
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
Feb 7th, 2020
Average FPS
222 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
100%
Price, $
$2499.98
4%
Value, $/FPS
$11.26/FPS
5%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2643 vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2643 vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2643
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
4-core
6%
L3 Cache
10 MB
4%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
81%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
Feb 7th, 2020
Cores
64-core
100%
L3 Cache
256 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
88%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2643 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 3990X Feb 7th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Feb 7th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | $3,990.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | TRX4 |
130W | Power Consumption | 280W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
