In Atomfall, the Xeon E5-2643 is slightly slower than the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $28 cheaper!
Xeon E5-2643
- Up to 22% cheaper – $100.70 vs $128.99
- Up to 22% cheaper
- Up to 16% better value in Atomfall – $0.52 vs $0.62/FPS
- Up to 16% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 28% less energy – 130 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 28% less energy
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 8% faster in Atomfall – 206 vs 191 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in Atomfall
- Is 5 years and 5 months newer – Aug 31, 2017 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 5 years and 5 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2643 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-2643
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
191 FPS
93%
Min 1% FPS
143 FPS
92%
Price, $
$100.7
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.52/FPS
100%
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Aug 31st, 2017
Average FPS
206 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
155 FPS
100%
Price, $
$128.99
78%
Value, $/FPS
$0.62/FPS
84%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2643 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2643 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2643
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
10 MB
31%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
87%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
88%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Aug 31st, 2017
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2643 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 1900X Aug 31st, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $549.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | SP3r2 |
130W | Power Consumption | 180W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
