In Atomfall, the Xeon E5-2643 is slower than the Core i9-14900KF. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $329 cheaper!
Xeon E5-2643
- Up to 77% cheaper – $100.70 vs $429.99
- Up to 77% cheaper
- Up to 70% better value in Atomfall – $0.52 vs $1.73/FPS
- Up to 70% better value in Atomfall
Core i9-14900KF
- Up to 28% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 193 FPS
- Up to 28% faster in Atomfall
- Is 11 years and 7 months newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 11 years and 7 months newer
- Consumes up to 4% less energy – 125 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 4% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2643 vs Core i9-14900KF: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-2643
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
193 FPS
78%
Min 1% FPS
145 FPS
78%
Price, $
$100.7
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.52/FPS
100%
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$429.99
23%
Value, $/FPS
$1.73/FPS
30%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2643 vs Core i9-14900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2643 vs Core i9-14900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2643
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
10 MB
28%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
58%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2643 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900KF Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $564.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
