In Rust, the Xeon E5-2640 is same performance as the FX-4350. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2640
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
FX-4350
- Is 1 year and 1 month newer – Apr 29, 2013 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 1 year and 1 month newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Rust FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2640 vs FX-4350: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Average FPS
208 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
41 FPS
100%
Price, $
$82.71
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2640 vs FX-4350 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2640 vs FX-4350 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2640
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
15 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
60%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
70%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
53%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2640 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-4350 Apr 29th, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | AM3+ |
95W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
