In Deathloop, the Xeon E5-2640 is slightly faster than the Core i7-8700. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2640
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 221 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
Core i7-8700
- Is 5 years and 6 months newer – Oct 05, 2017 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 5 years and 6 months newer
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2640 vs Core i7-8700: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-8700
Oct 5th, 2017
Average FPS
219 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
99%
Price, $
$178.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.81/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2640 vs Core i7-8700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2640 vs Core i7-8700 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2640
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
15 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
65%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-8700
Oct 5th, 2017
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
80%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2640 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-8700 Oct 5th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $303.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 95W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
