In Battlefield 6, the Xeon E5-2640 v3 is slower than the Ryzen 5 5600G. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2640 v3
No clear advantages
Ryzen 5 5600G
- Up to 33% faster in Battlefield 6 – 92 vs 69 FPS
- Up to 33% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 6 years and 7 months newer – Apr 13, 2021 vs Sep 08, 2014
- Is 6 years and 7 months newer
- Consumes up to 28% less energy – 65 vs 90 Watts
- Consumes up to 28% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2640 v3 vs Ryzen 5 5600G: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2640 v3 vs Ryzen 5 5600G in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2640 v3 vs Ryzen 5 5600G in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2640 v3
Sep 8th, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
77%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
58%
Ryzen 5 5600G
Apr 13th, 2021
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
16 MB
80%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2640 v3 Sep 8th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 5600G Apr 13th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Released | Apr 13th, 2021 |
| $939.00 | MSRP | $259.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | AM4 |
| 90 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Radeon Vega 7 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
