In Atomfall, the Xeon E5-2640 v3 is slower than the Core Ultra 7 265F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2640 v3
No clear advantages
Core Ultra 7 265F
- Up to 21% faster in Atomfall – 245 vs 203 FPS
- Up to 21% faster in Atomfall
- Is 10 years and 3 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Sep 08, 2014
- Is 10 years and 3 months newer
- Consumes up to 28% less energy – 65 vs 90 Watts
- Consumes up to 28% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2640 v3 vs Core Ultra 7 265F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$288
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.17/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2640 v3 vs Core Ultra 7 265F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2640 v3 vs Core Ultra 7 265F in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2640 v3
Sep 8th, 2014
Cores
8-core
40%
L3 Cache
20 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
64%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
29%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2640 v3 Sep 8th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265F Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
| $939.00 | MSRP | $379.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 90 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
