Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 2622 days newer than Xeon E5-2640 v2.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2640 v2
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 95 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 39% better in New World than Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 135 vs 97 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 24 vs 16 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
135
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.14/FPS
100%
Price, $
$289.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $289.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 115 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2640 v2 | vs | Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |