Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 3781 days newer than Xeon E5-2640 v2.
Advantages of Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 25% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 137 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 28 vs 16 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
137
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.97/FPS
100%
Price, $
$269.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $269.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 85 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2640 v2 | vs | Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 20 |
16 | Threads | 28 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |