In Rust, the Xeon E5-2637 v3 is slightly slower than the Core i5-9400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2637 v3
No clear advantages
Core i5-9400F
- Up to 2% faster in Rust – 226 vs 221 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Rust
- Is 4 years and 4 months newer – Jan 08, 2019 vs Sep 08, 2014
- Is 4 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 52% less energy – 65 vs 135 Watts
- Consumes up to 52% less energy
Rust FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2637 v3 vs Core i5-9400F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
226 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
54 FPS
100%
Price, $
$119.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2637 v3 vs Core i5-9400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2637 v3 vs Core i5-9400F in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2637 v3
Sep 8th, 2014
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
15 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
90%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
80%
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
60%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2637 v3 Sep 8th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9400F Jan 8th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Released | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| $996.00 | MSRP | – |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 135 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
