The Xeon E5-2637 v2 is a slower gaming CPU than the Ryzen 9 5900X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Ryzen 9 5900X
- A faster gaming CPU than the Xeon E5-2637 v2
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than the Xeon E5-2637 v2 – 105 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than the Xeon E5-2637 v2 – 24 vs 8 threads
Xeon E5-2637 v2 vs Ryzen 9 5900X for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Xeon E5-2637 v2
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
170
84%
Min 1% FPS
114
85%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 9 5900X
Nov 5th, 2020
Average FPS
203
100%
Min 1% FPS
134
100%
Price, $
$261.86
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.29/FPS
100%
Xeon E5-2637 v2 vs Ryzen 9 5900X in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2637 v2 vs Ryzen 9 5900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2637 v2 vs Ryzen 9 5900X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2637 v2
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
10 MB
16%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
79%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 9 5900X
Nov 5th, 2020
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Xeon E5-2637 v2 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Not Available | MSRP | $549.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Vermeer |
130 W | Power Consumption | 105 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.8 GHz |
10 MB | L3 Cache | 64 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | No |
No | Overclockable | Yes |