In Control, the Xeon E5-2630 is slightly slower than the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and it's also a slightly worse value for money, as it's $20 more expensive!
Xeon E5-2630
- Consumes up to 47% less energy – 95 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 47% less energy
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 1% faster in Control – 248 vs 245 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Control
- Is 6 years and 6 months newer – Oct 03, 2018 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 6 years and 6 months newer
- Up to 8% cheaper – $229.99 vs $249.95
- Up to 8% cheaper
- Up to 10% better value in Control – $0.92 vs $1.02/FPS
- Up to 10% better value in Control
Control FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2630 vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-2630
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
245 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
99%
Price, $
$249.95
92%
Value, $/FPS
$1.02/FPS
90%
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Oct 3rd, 2018
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
162 FPS
100%
Price, $
$229.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2630 vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2630 vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2630
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
6-core
50%
L3 Cache
15 MB
47%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
66%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
65%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Oct 3rd, 2018
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2630 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 2920X Oct 3rd, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
| – | MSRP | $649.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | SP3r2 |
95W | Power Consumption | 180W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
