In Rust, the Xeon E5-2630 is slightly slower than the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $50 more expensive!
Xeon E5-2630
- Consumes up to 47% less energy – 95 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 47% less energy
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 8% faster in Rust – 225 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in Rust
- Is 5 years and 5 months newer – Aug 10, 2017 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 5 years and 5 months newer
- Up to 20% cheaper – $199.99 vs $249.95
- Up to 20% cheaper
- Up to 26% better value in Rust – $0.88 vs $1.19/FPS
- Up to 26% better value in Rust
Rust FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2630 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-2630
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
209 FPS
93%
Min 1% FPS
42 FPS
78%
Price, $
$249.95
80%
Value, $/FPS
$1.19/FPS
74%
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Aug 10th, 2017
Average FPS
225 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
54 FPS
100%
Price, $
$199.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2630 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2630 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2630
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
6-core
50%
L3 Cache
15 MB
47%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
66%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
70%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Aug 10th, 2017
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2630 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Aug 10th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $799.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | SP3r2 |
95W | Power Consumption | 180W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
