In Battlefield 6, the Xeon E5-2630 is quite a bit slower than the Ryzen 9 5900X and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $19 cheaper!
Xeon E5-2630
- Up to 7% cheaper – $249.95 vs $269.00
- Up to 7% cheaper
- Consumes up to 10% less energy – 95 vs 105 Watts
- Consumes up to 10% less energy
Ryzen 9 5900X
- Up to 70% faster in Battlefield 6 – 104 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 70% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 8 years and 8 months newer – Nov 05, 2020 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 8 years and 8 months newer
- Up to 37% better value in Battlefield 6 – $2.58 vs $4.09/FPS
- Up to 37% better value in Battlefield 6
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2630 vs Ryzen 9 5900X: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-2630
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
61 FPS
59%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
59%
Price, $
$249.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.09/FPS
63%
Ryzen 9 5900X
Nov 5th, 2020
Average FPS
104 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
78 FPS
100%
Price, $
$269
92%
Value, $/FPS
$2.58/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2630 vs Ryzen 9 5900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2630 vs Ryzen 9 5900X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2630
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
6-core
50%
L3 Cache
15 MB
23%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
62%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
58%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 9 5900X
Nov 5th, 2020
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2630 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 5900X Nov 5th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Released | Nov 5th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | $549.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | AM4 |
95 W | Power Consumption | 105 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
