In Atomfall, the Xeon E5-2630 is slightly slower than the FX-8370. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2630
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
FX-8370
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall – 189 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall
- Is 2 years and 5 months newer – Sep 02, 2014 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 2 years and 5 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2630 vs FX-8370: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-2630
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
188 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
141 FPS
100%
Price, $
$249.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.32/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2630 vs FX-8370 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2630 vs FX-8370 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2630
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
15 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
57%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
65%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
FX-8370
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
53%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2630 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-8370 Sep 2nd, 2014 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
| – | MSRP | $199.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | AM3+ |
95W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
