In Deathloop, the Xeon E5-2630 is same performance as the FX-6300. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $209 more expensive!
Xeon E5-2630
No clear advantages
FX-6300
- Is 7 months and 17 days newer – Oct 23, 2012 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 7 months and 17 days newer
- Up to 84% cheaper – $40.65 vs $249.95
- Up to 84% cheaper
- Up to 84% better value in Deathloop – $0.18 vs $1.13/FPS
- Up to 84% better value in Deathloop
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2630 vs FX-6300: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-2630
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
220 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
165 FPS
99%
Price, $
$249.95
16%
Value, $/FPS
$1.13/FPS
16%
FX-6300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
221 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
100%
Price, $
$40.65
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.18/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2630 vs FX-6300 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2630 vs FX-6300 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2630
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
15 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
66%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
68%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
FX-6300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
53%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2630 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-6300 Oct 23rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | $132.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | AM3+ |
| 95W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
