In Deathloop, the Xeon E5-2630 is same performance as the FX-4350. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $167 more expensive!
Xeon E5-2630
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
FX-4350
- Is 1 year and 1 month newer – Apr 29, 2013 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 1 year and 1 month newer
- Up to 67% cheaper – $82.71 vs $249.95
- Up to 67% cheaper
- Up to 67% better value in Deathloop – $0.37 vs $1.12/FPS
- Up to 67% better value in Deathloop
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2630 vs FX-4350: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-2630
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
222 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
99%
Price, $
$249.95
33%
Value, $/FPS
$1.12/FPS
33%
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Average FPS
222 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
100%
Price, $
$82.71
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2630 vs FX-4350 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2630 vs FX-4350 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2630
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
15 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
55%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
65%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
53%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2630 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-4350 Apr 29th, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | AM3+ |
95W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
