In Atomfall, the Xeon E5-2630 is slower than the Core i9-14900KF. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $180 cheaper!
Xeon E5-2630
- Up to 42% cheaper – $249.95 vs $429.99
- Up to 42% cheaper
- Up to 24% better value in Atomfall – $1.31 vs $1.73/FPS
- Up to 24% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
Core i9-14900KF
- Up to 31% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 31% faster in Atomfall
- Is 11 years and 7 months newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 11 years and 7 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2630 vs Core i9-14900KF: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-2630
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
190 FPS
77%
Min 1% FPS
142 FPS
76%
Price, $
$249.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.31/FPS
100%
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$429.99
58%
Value, $/FPS
$1.73/FPS
76%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2630 vs Core i9-14900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2630 vs Core i9-14900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2630
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
15 MB
42%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
72%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
47%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2630 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900KF Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $564.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1700 |
95 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
